By enforcing EU-only processing at the infrastructure level. Alert data, investigative artefacts, enrichment queries, and AI model inference all run inside EU boundaries. There aren't any cross-region model calls or hidden processing dependencies. Data residency is enforced architecturally, not just by policy.

No. Customer investigation data isn't used to train or fine-tune foundation models. Alert data and investigative context are processed solely for inference, aren't retained for training, and aren't shared across customers. Each deployment operates within its own data boundary.

Yes. Dropzone produces evidence-backed investigation reports built for review and compliance workflows. Every conclusion links to the underlying evidence, the queried data sources, and the reasoning steps. The leading European MSSP required investigations to be explainable, evidence-backed, and auditable from day one.

Yes. The AI SOC Analyst operates within human-defined scope, permissions, and escalation policies. It investigates and produces reports, but remediation and incident decisions stay with authorised personnel unless explicitly configured otherwise. Every investigation includes a transparent audit trail, and analysts can review or override outcomes at any time.

Not without explicit customer authorisation. EU deployments restrict access to authorised personnel under controlled access policies, and there's no routine access to EU customer data from non-EU locations. Access controls are enforced at the infrastructure and identity level, not just by policy.

No. Alert data and AI investigation workflows are processed within EU infrastructure boundaries. Investigation data isn't transmitted to non-EU regions for model inference, enrichment, or analysis. Some third-party threat intelligence feeds may not offer EU-specific endpoints; you control which feeds are enabled.